Re: Re: Re: Re: IRIS say Windows 7 compliance by 2nd half 2010
by Anonymous
Windows Certified compatibility needs to be looked at in several ways: 1) The ISV WANTS Microsoft to sign off not just on the application, but it's install and uninstall processes and the way it uses the PC 2) The ISV is happy to pay Microsoft for the logo 3) The ISV believes that having the logo is important Many of the ISVs I work with do not care about #1 at all, so don't even bother to run the tests. Most who run the tests end up passing as the process is iterative and free until you have cleaned up the application. It is worth noting that we have more apps passed for Windows 7 than we had for a long time for Windows XP and most of the apps available for XP still do not carry the logo. Not because they can't, but because users use it without, so why have the expense. Still happy to hear about ISVs that won't support their solution on WIndows 7. David
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.