Home
Re: Re: Is this the answer to the Progress -v- SQL Server debate ?
by Anonymous
I agree but seriously here is a product that makes the process of going from something that is an anagram for the common name of Cyprinidae to sql easier. Which means you must have both Progress and SQL and this product to make the coexistance easier. Which begs the gob smacking stategic question of why not move to a product that support SQL and ditch Progress and forgo the coexistance pain.
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.