|
|
||||
|
Recent Comments
Who's there?
Search
Month Archive
|
Re: Is this the answer to the Progress -v- SQL Server debate ?
by
Anonymous
"that handles dates before 1753"
That's gotta be a clincher then. I know that this is the "first" date Microsoft recognises but to advertise a product saying "we can deal with dates from the 1600's" is not that great. I cannot think of any statute limitation dates that this would have any relevance to.
|
Recent Articles
Twitter Updates Categories
Login
|
||




















