Re: XML standard announced for e-discovery industry
by Anonymous
The think-tank level of both LiST and EDRM are essential if we are to move forward. I agree with Jonathan Maas that neither excludes the other and both add not just to the debate but to the practical advance, particularly if suppliers join in. What matters as much (not more, but as much) is the message to the users and their clients. Proposed technical standards and sharp-looking acronyms tend to obscure two messages – what they can (and should) be doing NOW and that what matters most is thinking through the process whatever technical wizardry is or will be available. Both Jonathan Maas and George Socha of EDRM emphasise this message repeatedly. Chris Dale www.chrisdalelawyersupport.co.uk http://chrisdale.wordpress.com
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.