View Article  Event clashes ahoy !
For the last decade we've been familiar with the frequent LegalTech New York + Legal IT Show London calendar clashes in early February. However from 2011 it looks like this problem has been solved, with LegalTech remaining at its traditional time of late January/early February (apparently it is timed to coincide with the Superbowl - some kind of American sporting event involving lots of men in protective clothing running around in ever-decreasing circles - next year it is 31 Jan to 2nd Feb) while Legal IT  moves to 1st & 2nd March. This should also avoid the problem of heavy snow blighting the second day of the London show as it has done in the past.

So, hooray. No, hang on... the new Legal IT Show dates overlap with the ARK Group Lex 2011 event which was provisionally scheduled for 2 & 3 March. We have asked ARK for clarification on the date - and we see the date no longer appears on the website for the event.
View Article  Guest article: could Halliwells have avoided its fate?
By James Courtis-Pond, Director at Rosslyn Analytics, and former City lawyer and general counsel...
 
Could Halliwells have avoided administration if it had a stronger handling on its finances? Probably not but it's worth exploring for a moment because Halliwells is a microcosm of what could happen to just about every business falling on harder times after rapid expansion, commoditization of services and finally consolidation.

Now, I don't claim to be privy to all the internal details at Halliwells - and clearly the main components of this sad event are on the debt/revenue side - but, perhaps, generic to most in the legal industry, the cost side has not been as deeply understood and managed as well as it might have been. Why do I say that?
 
Two years ago I offered Halliwells our spend analytics and integrated contract management service.  The response at the time was politely "Thanks but no thanks." The reason given was that most of the firm's costs are salaries.
 
You do not have to be a rocket scientist to appreciate 70% of a law firms spend is on salaries, usually followed by rent and professional insurance. But the major focus of spend analysis is directed at that tail of 20% to 25% of indirect spend, which is spent on running a firm. It is here where spend visibility has been traditionally weak and money is left on the table. Whether your indirect spend is £1m or £100m, a proven toolkit to help you cut up to 20% of that spend has to be taken seriously. For example, a law firm with a profit margin of 30%, cutting just £100,000 of spend is equivalent to £300,000 of new revenue. This may explain why forward-looking law firms take spend analysis seriously, but more on this later.
 
So when I hear a managing partner tell me "we think we have our spend fully covered," after only a little questioning it often becomes clear to us both that "We actually have little visibility of spend outside our top suppliers, that is exponentially complicated if you want a global or parented view, and we have very little idea where our physical contracts are, when they terminate or when we should receive volume rebates." Case in point, a procurement officer at one of the largest law firms recently told me that "if I want to know how much I spend with a supplier I have to phone and ask that supplier. I am lucky if I get an answer by the end of the month." This is a waste of negotiating/bargaining power.
 
It is not all dire, though. Law firms are increasingly taking steps to better understand and analyze their spending patterns. Through spend visibility comes better cost side decision-making that results in plugging cash leakage and making additional savings through improved sourcing opportunities. At the end of the day, it's a competitive advantage to understand and manage your costs better than the firms you are competing against for business. 
 
Information systems cannot stop firms going into administration but I do strongly believe spend analysis does help executives better manage their bottom-line.

View Article  Something for the weekend - the Alt Legal IT Awards ?
Well you have been chivvying me all week, so here are the categories for our new spoof legal IT awards – aka The Alternative Legal Technology Awards aka The No List aka The Not-The-Loties aka The Legal IT Losers aka The Switchies aka... Well we are still working on the branding. Maybe we'll just call it the Another lame Irish comedian reads out weak jokes while you eat indifferent food and drink over-priced booze awards – that or we'll do an Apple and just stick an "i" in front of the name The iLegals maybe. Here are the categories – and all supplied by IT directors and IT vendors who clearly have too much time on their hands...

Category 1: Most Inept Government Legal IT Initiative Award
This is likely to be a hard fought competition with many candidates for the shortlist. The judges will be looking for extreme and sustained incompetence and will be looking for nominations from other government departments not just the MOJ and HMRC.

Category 2: Can I borrow your watch to tell you the time Award
This award is offered to anyone setting themselves up as a consultant in the legal industry to offer legal IT advice. The criteria to win this award is strict. They must have set themselves up as a legal IT consultant without having a clue what they are talking about. Some evidence of this will include-
1. Never having worked for a law firm before.
2. Assuming that lawyers are “just like everyone else”.
3. Expecting suppliers to train them on the job.

Category 3: “I’ll have what Janet Day’s got” Award
A prestigious award open to legal IT directors who make major purchasing decisions on the basis that somebody else has already bought it and if it is good enough for them it is good enough for me. The judges will be looking for evidence that the product chosen is wholly unsuitable for the size/profile of the firm that has bought the application.

Category 4: "After Extensive Market Research” Award
Awarded to any firm who replaces a major part of their IT systems (usually PMS or case) claiming to carryout extensive market research but in fact just buying from the first supplier who comes through the door. In order to win this award the firm must then be persuaded to support the supplier with an appropriately gushing puff press release.

Category 5: Opaque Product Strategy Award
In the first of our supplier categories this award is given to the legal software supplier who is able to define their product strategy is such a way that nobody can actually understand it. It will not be sufficient to demonstrate that clients are confused. Winners will be expected to show that none of their own staff have much of a clue and ideally the author of the strategy should struggle to explain it as well. Judges will be looking for over-use of the word .NET.

Category 6: Maintenance Value Award
This award is given to the supplier who can demonstrate the ability to deliver very little product improvement and enhancement in return for their maintenance income. Suppliers looking to win this award must be able to clearly demonstrate that they have not improved the product at all over the period whilst threatening the end user of the dire consequences of failing to pay their invoice.

Category 7: The “Fred the Shred” Award
This award is given to the supplier who has, in the eyes of the judges (from an end user perspective), carried out the most poorly thought through takeover of another organisation based largely on the vanity of the chief executive. This is likely to be a quite a large shortlist so the judges will be looking to reduce the numbers by applying the following criteria.
1. Credit will be given to firms having to borrow money to fund most of the deal.
2. If a previously good brand can be ruined in the process extra points will be awarded.
3. Losing clients within the first few months of announcing a deal will be well received.
4. Failure to retain key staff will be viewed positively.

Category 8: The Left or Right award
Presented to the supplier that has shown the highest levels of incompetence in the sector. Suppliers shortlisted must have clearly demonstrated significant failure in their decision making process over a number of years. When common sense would dictate a right turn the management team will have shown a complete disregard for this and stormed to the left at breakneck speed. Having made many of the above decisions the supplier will have shown great determination in the face of well made comment to continue with the original decision despite the evidence from clients migrating to other suppliers. The supplier will have shown ruthless determination in sacking anyone with experience or an ounce of common sense in the sector. Suppliers must provide at least three compromise agreements for well known individuals who they have managed to exit. The above will of course be backed up by a desire to also hire and fire as many MD's as possible within a short timescale. Preferably those listed will have had zero expertise for the job and will have demonstrated to the staff their complete incompetence within a few months of joining. On the the night those Suppliers shortlisted will also need to demonstrate their 'left or right' credentials by announcing the day before key decisions such as their MD has departed on holiday and didn't realise they might win an award or those with a high degree of nerve might leave it until a few minutes before and demonstrate complete indecision over who will collect the award.

Category 9: The Pin-Cushion Award
Open to both law firms and vendors, this is for the executive who having inherited a technology or strategy disaster and/or warned his/her board of the dire consequences of failing to take a particular course of action, is stabbed in the back and fired by said board when the whole thing collapses due to said board's failure to heed his or her warnings. (Also known as the Scapegoat Award.)

Category 10: The Kiss of Death Award
This is open to law firms, vendors and individuals who, having previously won an award in another awards scheme or else been designated an expert in a trade directory, find that from then on their career/business/reputation nosedives at a near terminal velocity.

Category 11: The OMG - LOL Award
This is open to individuals in both law firms and vendors whose behaviour has been so outrageous, with possibly career terminating consequences, that the natural response is to say "Oh, my god" and burst out laughing. As in "OMG, Instead of going back to the office to face the music, they then took another day off to play golf." The judges will be looking for tales of sexual and/or alcohol fuelled excess.

Category 12: The "That's Enough Awards" Award


View Article  S.J. Berwin select Litera for redlining & metadata
S.J. Berwin has selected Litera Change-Pro for its document comparison and redlining requirements. The firm is also taking Litera's MetaDact metadata sweeping application, along with Powerpoint and embedded Excel spreadsheet comparison software.
View Article  June issue of Legal Technology Insider newsletter out now
The June issue of the UK & EMEA edition of the Legal Technology Insider newsletter is out now. (The digital edition has already hit desktops & the print edition will be arriving from tomorrow.) Top stories include: the ongoing cycle of swapouts in the UK PMS market + the return of Tom Lee and Quintec with a SaaS/Cloud-based document management system for the legal sector. The next issue is out on 22 July, so don't miss the 16 July deadline.
View Article  Personal view: Jonathan Maas on the iPad - will it make a difference to the practice of law?
Hello, my name is Jonathan and I am a self-confessed iAddict.

I admit that during the Easter of 2008 I met, and fell in love with, my brother’s iPhone.  Like star-crossed lovers we stole furtive moments together over the long weekend, entwined in sun-dappled corners of empty rooms.  In my heart of hearts I knew the relationship was doomed to failure because I knew I wasn’t ready to leave my service provider.  The poignancy of what we were doing was as painful as it was inevitable.  I can still remember, as if it were yesterday, the snow swirling in the rural dusk of Easter Monday; the darting, searching looks we exchanged, each glance weighted with more suppressed emotion than a library of Barbara Cartland novels.  Thus we parted, reluctantly going our separate ways.  Sure, we met occasionally over the coming months but it was never the same.  What remained unsaid between us was deafening, but what was done could not be undone.  It was one of the most painful moments of my life.

But then, in the depths of 2009 when I thought my iLife was not to be, I was introduced at a party to the beautiful 32Gb iPod Touch and what was dark became light, what was miserable became jubilant (and, best of all, I didn’t have to tell my service provider).  Of course, I soon outgrew my Touch and was only too ready to consign it to love’s unkind dustbin when its 64Gb younger sister came of age.  Looking back now, I have no regrets.  The old model is still with me, kept busy working away in my kitchen, and I still occasionally update its apps –  it’s not like it’s all over between us.  But the months from the summer of 2009 to the spring of 2010 were heady indeed, full of the laughter of two hearts beating as one.  We faced the world and won, time and time and time again!  Nothing could come between us.

The iPad is an insidious thing.  It has a way of demanding your time, assuming priority over all other demands.  Before you know it you’re shacked up together in an exclusive relationship of its own making.  But I love it like I have never loved anything before (thankfully, my wife doesn’t read legal journals).

So, I am clearly an iAddict, but will any of this change the practice of law?  Honest answer?  I don’t know, but I’m convinced it’s a definite maybe.  What I do think about this iTechnology, and I have thought this since I first saw it in 2008, is that this represents the most amazing and fundamental change to the way in which we interact with computers and the way in which they respond to us, and that it affects everyone, not just lawyers.  I have long thought that hardware has been the main limiting factor to the growth of technology.  Apple have taken us to the basement of the next level up and that I find very, very exciting.  I expect the next few years will bring with them some remarkable developments.

So, iPad, iPod or iPhone?  I ran out of space on my 32Gb iPod Touch and jumped on the 64Gb version when it came out a few months after I bought my 32Gb one.  The 64Gb is now also full, with nearly 7000 tracks and 208 apps (all my iThings are jailbroken – not dependent on finding and loading everything through iTunes) so I can add non-Apple-approved apps and greatly expand what my iThings look like and how they work).  It is increasingly being demoted to the role of simple music player as I gain more experience with my iPad.  However, the jury is still most certainly out on this as the iPod is so much easier (and less pretentious) to whip out in public.  My iPad, by the way, is the WiFi only, 32Gb model (I didn’t want to splurge too much on it to start with).

I find I am using my iPad for the internet much more than I do my laptop at home as it is much quicker to get to a browser because it is always on.  It is also very sexy to use, no doubt about it.  The screen resolution is superior to that of my not-so-old Toshiba Vista laptop, as well.  Partly because of the quality of the screen, partly because of the innovative controls and partly because of the quality of the games I also use it quite a lot for playing games during my commute home.  I read books on it on the way in as I have a few book reading apps that I am trying out.  I see my iPad playing a huge role in my reading habits, both with traditional books and multimedia magazines/newspapers.  Its size and shape lend it to these functions well.

On the business front I have bought a presentations app called Keynote, which can play PowerPoint shows (as well as its own).  Slide transitions and the clever use of graphics (by example) make my slides stand out.  I have on order a cable to allow me to output to standard projectors but what is proving great is that when I am talking to people about what I do I can show them then and there a few illustrative slides in Keynote in an intimate presentation. I am trying out a WP app called Pages (a sister app to Keynote) but it is early days (and I haven’t yet invested in the iPad’s external keyboard). 

I have installed Citrix and GoToMeeting but have not yet tried them out in earnest (but the interesting thing is that they exist).  We don’t use a real-time time recording system like Carpe Diem but I have bought an app called Time Master that allows me to do that (I first got it on my iPod) and to produce exports/reports that then have to be keyed into our system.  LinkedIn, Skype, Twitter all have apps and I know there is at least one UK law/statute app and 7Safe, an edisclosure and forensic IT company, have released a review app for their customers using an iPad or iPhone.  They are, I think, the first to do so.  Software house CompanionLink have a free app called DejaOffice which purports to bring together in one place the iPad’s different apps for contacts, calendar, to dos and so on but, again, it is early days for me.  I have double-entried my work and personal diaries for so long now I don’t think twice about it

By the way, many iPhone and iPod Touch apps will work on the iPad but, if not upgraded, will appear iPhone/iPod size on the iPad’s screen (although there is a zoom facility to make them appear somewhat like native iPad apps).  There are concerns about connectivity that are probably real in relation to unjailbroken iPads but I have so far got around those by using email.  For instance, I get my PowerPoint slide shows into Keynote by mailing them to my home email address and uploading when I get home.  That will, I‘m sure, lead to interesting discussions around client/commercial confidentiality issues in the future.

I can certainly see me wandering around flicking through pages of legal reference material and electronic evidence as if on a clipboard (the iPad offers a delicious page curling – not just page turning – effect which is soooo like the real thing and zooming in and out is efficient).  I can certainly see me wowing people with the sheer fun and novelty of the thing (which may make arranging meetings easier – there is a US edisclosure company offering free iPads to customers) and, like a snazzy car, it does attract  a crowd whenever it appears.

My conclusion?  I don’t know, but I’m convinced it’s a definite maybe!  (One thing I do know is  that I’m going to be Mr Popular when it’s time to allocate our first project to collect data from an iPad.)  People have likened the iPad to Marmite.  I think it’s more complex than that: there are those who cannot see the point, there are those who worship anything Apple, there are those who can see an immediate business use for it and those who are prepared to take a leap of faith in case a business use appears.  I am the latter.


View Article  Zylpha say they have an answer to the MoJ RTA portal debacle
Legal software specialist Zylpha say they have a solution "that eases the pain of the latest Government IT shambles" now read on, as these are their words and not our's...

"It is fair to say the UK government does not have a pain free record of implementing successful IT projects and one of the latest ones, the Road Traffic Accident (RTA) insurance claims portal is no exception. The idea behind the portal is that it will significantly speed up the processing and payment of low cost claims by digitising and streamlining communications between claimant lawyers, insurers and compensators leading to all claims being resolved with the new time limit of 15 days, instead of the previous 60-to-90 days.

"However, the implementation of the portal was so rushed that the data interface specifications were still in a state of flux when it went live on the 30th of April and this led to the suspension of  new registrations for several day as soon as it went live to sort out the mess. Even when operational again, users discovered that the manual data entry through the data collection screen was a very laborious and error prone problem, taking an average of  30 minutes per claim and processing errors in the portal have been discovered by around 50 organisations. Such was the degree of unhappiness of the user community that they formed their own protest group on the leading business networking Linkedin. A typical comment from a disgruntled user commented that the development of the portal was ‘like the blind leading the blind’ and 'The portal people have been fobbing us off forever, saying it’s all in hand’."

Zylpha, who specialise in providing integration, connectivity and security solutions for case management systems, had the foresight to predict the need to develop a direct web based integration solution that extracts and updates the required information from an underlying case management system such as SolCase or Visualfiles and is flexible and responsive enough to maintain alignment with the shifting interface  specifications throughout the early 'switch on' period. Currently Zylpha has nine organisations using its Rapid RTA solution, with users having processed many hundreds of claims through the portal

Paul Hinchliffe, practice manager & co-founder of Bott & Co comments: "Bott & Co settle over 7000 accident claims every year, recovering in excess of £40 million in personal injury compensation for their clients with a 99% success rate, so we need a robust reliable solution for working with the Portal. Having evaluated other solutions we found that Zylpha's Rapid RTA was a much more comprehensive and ready to use product, with all the integration, scripts and screens included and ready to use.

"Zylpha’s solution was up and running within a couple of days and because it is integrated so well with our SolCase case management system out of the box, there was minimal training required to start using it. We are now seeing a significant improvement in speed, efficiency and security of processing these claims as a direct result. We estimate that using the portal is saving us around 30 minutes per claim just at Stage 1 and we are being paid the Stage 1 costs much more rapidly. This has given us a quick return on our investment."

View Article  Interaction launch Strategic Account Mangement
LexisNexis has announced the global launch of InterAction Strategic Account Management, a new customer relationship management (CRM) application for professional services firms. Strategic Account Management equips multi-disciplinary client teams with tools that improve their performance across multiple offices and geographic locations. Businesses can now enhance knowledge sharing and better track, coordinate and align the activities of individual team members with broader account management and client satisfaction goals.

InterAction Strategic Account Management is the first application for professional service markets to integrate a CRM solution built on the Microsoft.NET framework, providing compatibility with Microsoft SharePoint. This platform facilitates information sharing across multiple software programs, making content and insights from the InterAction CRM database and the Strategic Account Management application seamlessly accessible on SharePoint portals and dashboards.
Existing InterAction customers can use Strategic Account Management to strengthen collaboration of client teams across multiple offices, geographic locations and an array of practice areas with immediate data access, visibility and sharing provided by the .NET framework.

“Large, geographically dispersed client teams often struggle to operate efficiently and cohesively,” said Tim Cheadle, general manager for LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. “InterAction Strategic Account Management enables multiple-user collaboration across the enterprise, and provides team leaders with the ability to address challenges and enhance performance while improving client satisfaction with a built-in feedback mechanism.”

Once Strategic Account Management is launched, InterAction data seamlessly integrates into the new application enabling synchronisation of teams’ strategic communication and tracking of client issues. Team leaders can better manage processes, set and drive goals and track performance while improving productivity and cross-selling opportunities. Strategic Account Management introduces a number of new features that go beyond contact management, marketing automation and relationship intelligence, which are already offered by InterAction. These new features include:
•    Ability to set and manage goals by revenue targets, relationships and customer satisfaction. Strategic Account Management users can also create customized goals to suit corporate or team needs.
•    Ability to broadcast from within the Strategic Account Management application, with announcements to the entire team, wherever they may be located
•    Task management and notification
•    Management of client issues and tracking of opportunities


View Article  Thomson Reuters launch pro bono portal
Thomson Reuters Foundation has launched TrustLaw, what it describes as "an ambitious global service that will transform access  to pro bono legal support and provide an international hub on anti-corruption and good governance issues. The new service www.trust.org/trustlaw will widen access to the rule of law and promote greater transparency, empowering people with trusted information and free legal assistance.

Speaking at the launch, Monique Villa, CEO of the Thomson Reuters Foundation said “At a time of great economic uncertainty, legal support is more important than ever for organisations addressing the critical social and environmental issues of our age. The Thomson Reuters Foundation has set itself an ambitious goal: to create a truly international new marketplace connecting those in need of free legal assistance with those able to provide it - anywhere in the world. The dramatic response we have already seen from the non-profit and legal communities highlights the appetite and need for such a service.”

As a global online resource on anti-corruption and good governance, TrustLaw brings together a repository of information, advice and best practice, along with agenda-setting material from the Foundation’s expert editorial team. With a database of national legislation, international conventions, news, country profiles and law reviews, this will offer a one-stop shop for anti-corruption and governance information. This model will later be used for other areas including women’s rights.

At the heart of the project is TrustLaw Connect, an online marketplace for pro bono work, which will help to spread the culture and practice of pro bono legal assistance around the globe. TrustLaw Connect is a must-have tool for lawyers interested in doing high-impact pro bono and volunteer work. Likewise, social entrepreneurs, NGOs and government agencies will be able to readily access pro bono legal support from lawyers anywhere in the world – for free.  TrustLaw Connect itself is an online platform, offered free to all members, enabling fast, efficient connections between those in need of legal assistance and those able to provide it. It will act as a trusted intermediary, vetting participants on all sides to ensure confidence in the requests and assistance provided.

On the Trustlaw Connect service, Stuart Popham, Senior Partner Worldwide at Clifford Chance said: “Trustlaw is such a great concept that will really help lawyers fulfill their social responsibilities. It is independent, cutting edge and has already got the support of large parts of the international legal community. It will reach those around the world most in need, even those who are furthest from the protection of the law. I am delighted to be involved with this unique new marketplace.”

Monique Villa said “We recognised that a key barrier for law firms managing a pro bono programme is making initial contact with organisations with high impact projects. NGOs and entrepreneurs are also often unaware of the help they can receive. TrustLaw Connect will bridge this gap.” Over 190 organisations working in over 140 countries have already joined TrustLaw Connect, including over 60 leading law firms from around the world. Joining the first truly international service of its kind, ahead of launch, leading lawyers firms such as Slaughter and May, Eversheds, Herbert Smith, Torys, Bird & Bird and Beirut Legal have already assisted NGOs and entrepreneurs through the Trustlaw Connect network.

Comment: this is one of those stories you have to re-read 83 times to work out what they are on about. However we think it seems a good idea – even we do have a cynical view of large law firms talking about their social responsibilities and pro-bono work (a bit like celebrities doing good work 'for charidee'). The sites content is provided by Westlaw and Reuters writers.

View Article  Latest Asia-Pacific News Round-up
New win for Aderant
Australia-based insurance law firm Wotton + Kearney has chosen Aderant Expert as its new practice management system. The firm will implement the Aderant Expert practice and financial management system including Expert File Opening workflow and the new ClearView Performance module for advanced profitability analysis and reporting. "After considering all options, Aderant was a stand-out due to their reputation in the market for high quality products, rapid implementations, and excellent customer support," said David Kearney, managing partner of Wotton + Kearney.

ClearView Performance shows partners, practice group leaders, CFOs, and other senior staff exactly how they are performing, helping them see where they are operating according to plan and where they need improvement. It combines business intelligence capabilities with a full-featured business planning and profitability analysis tool. ClearView Performance presents critical data and metrics in a role-based graphical format, increasing information visibility and improving decision making.


Copitrak breaks into China
Cost recovery market leader Copitrak Systems has expanded its international operations with the opening of a new office in Shanghai. The move comes in response to 18 months of increasing demand across China with growth conservatively estimated at 40% for the 2010-11 financial year. Shanghai will focus solely on the mainland, while the long-standing Hong Kong office will cover the rest of Asia and the Pacific Rim.

For managing director Nicholas Child, the development was a logical one. "Having been in Hong Kong for the past nine years, we’ve been able to take advantage of the opening up of the Chinese market but we’ve reached a tipping point now that says we have to service it with a dedicated team and country presence. There is simply huge potential to be tapped and with our fully Unicode compliant system, we’re seeing interest not just from international law firms coming into the region but more importantly, from the Chinese law firms themselves. But to succeed there we know we have to respect the country and the culture; that means a local office, with local people, local support, a native on the ground resource that fully understands the commercial environment and client mindset."


WindowLogic Announce Release of iManage Integration for CRM4Legal
WindowLogic has announced the release of Logic4Outlook, an Outlook accelerator that provides seamless integration between iManage and Microsoft CRM4Legal. "Logic4Outlook is a perfect companion to CRM4Legal that will allow any or all of the information maintained within CRM4Legal to be displayed in the lawyers iManage workspace. Just click to record an email or document right into CRM4Legal from iManage or from CRM4Legal into iManage, all from within Outlook," said WindowLogic director Greg Brown.

"This product development delivers great benefits to law firm users," said David Blumentals CRM4Legal consultant & director, Asia Pacific. "CRM4Legal user adoption is greatly enhanced as CRM data is viewed each time iManage is accessed. Integration reduces the time it takes to navigate to your CRM4Legal data – just click the link to open your CRM records."

With the new Logic4Outlook product, users are able to view all CRM4Legal’s Contact, Organisation, Opportunity, Pitch, Matter and other information from iManage FileSite, and contact information for each recipient on an email. There is no need to go into CRM4Legal – all information required is displayed automatically unobtrusively. Configurable tabs and fields allow administrators to display any other information maintained within CRM4Legal, as required, even if the user does not have CRM4Legal installed locally.


Paul Wyatt now with WindowLogic
We first encountered Paul Wyatt at Linetime, then he moved to Solicitec (both legal IT vendors in the UK) and last time we heard of him, he was with Visualfiles Australia. He’s now taken over as Eastern seaboard sales manager for WindowLogic in Sydney, a company which he describes as "the Australian equivalent of Phoenix meets DocAuto meets Tikit."

He adds "The legal 'stream' at WindowLogic was established earlier this year and the business has attracted some key talent with considerable knowledge in this sector. Three of Alphawest’s senior Worksite consultants (with a combined 14 years experience in delivering Worksite projects globally) joined WindowLogic earlier this year and in the past 3 months they have developed a range of value add plug ins for Worksite.
Logic4Outlook is getting some serious interest and we have the application in beta test at one of Australia’s Top 10 law firms as we speak. We are also receiving a lot of requests for assistance in Worksite upgrade projects and have just taken over Worksite support and maintenance for 220 users at Sydney based Spruson & Ferguson, one of the leading intellectual property firms in Australia."
www.windowlogic.com.au


Janders Dean turns 75
Justin North of Janders Dean has been in touch to say "this year Janders Dean turns 75! Well, not really...that just happens to be the combined ages of Bevan and Justin this year as they both hit milestone birthdays. (What 37.5 ...Ed). This year actually marks our third birthday here at Janders Dean Our fabulous new clients this year have included Vodafone, Willmott Dixon and BAE Systems, while we've also continued to work with a number of our existing loyal customers including Freehills, Sparke Helmore, King and Wood, Hall & Wilcox and Barlow Lyde & Gilbert."

Janders Dean has also published a preliminary registration form (see attached PDF) for their upcoming Law Firm Knowledge Management Conference (Sydney, 12th August 2010). Places are strictly limited and capped for this event, and delegate passes are provided on a first in basis. Please send all completed registration forms back as soon as possible to avoid disappointment. The full agenda with thought leaders and speakers representing international organisations will be announced over the next few days.


Jason Hulme now with IQPC Sydney
Jason Hulme has been in touch to say "Thought you might like to know that I have left CPA Global to join the IQPC conferences group in Sydney. Although my role now sits over a number of conferences there will be a significant amount of work in law firm management inc outsourcing, IT, Leadership, KM etc. Gone are the days of the Legal IT Forum and By Legal For Legal but I am sure we can re kindle the quality events down under and create some high level controversy and debate here in Australia. Please give my best to the motley crew and speak soon." Jason.Hulme@iqpc.com.au


Nuix powers KPMG Forensic to deliver Australia’s fastest e-discovery service
KPMG has signed a deal with Nuix for high-end, powerful electronic discovery software licenses to enable them to provide Australia’s fastest, most thorough and most scalable eDiscovery service to its clients. KPMG Forensic’s team purchased the improved software to improve crucial data analysis and processing and selected Nuix for inclusion in its e-discovery service offering.

Eddie Sheehy, Nuix Chief Executive Officer, said KPMG required very fast, powerful processing and integrated into their service offering by adding Nuix to its official workflow. “In a world where many corporations face vast amounts of data, increasing regulatory requirements and litigation that demands immediate and thorough investigations of terabytes of digital information, speed is of the essence. Our software has been able to provide great results for KPMG’s eDiscovery product.” Sheehy commented.
 
KPMG’s decision hinged on the results of speed trials conducted by KPMG and on Nuix’s ability to integrate with other technologies within the KPMG workflow. Rod McKemmish, KPMG Forensic’s Director said that during initial speed trials, KPMG Australia reported indexing a 59GB Exchange Database (EDB) file – including 1.8 million emails and attachments – in 1 hour and 24 minutes. “Performance improvements beyond this appear to be possible when we scale beyond a single hardware device and apply the power of our advanced infrastructure. When one combines the power of high end processing with the forensic precision and in-depth analysis capabilities of Nuix, the results are impressive,” said McKemmish.
 
KPMG Australia has employed the Nuix electronic discovery desktop platform for the past three years. This latest deal marks a significant upgrade to KPMG’s Enterprise Discovery platform.  This is the same platform recently purchased by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to handle their corporate discoveries and investigations.

1 Attachments